Historical Pollen Count Data By Zip Code

Historical Pollen Count Data By Zip Code Average ratng: 7,8/10 8434 votes

The cities of the U.S. have been ranked according to how challenging they are to live in for people with allergies. The rankings come from the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America.

  1. Pine Pollen Counts By Zip Code
  2. Pollen And Mold Counts By Zip Code

Cities were scored on a 100-point scale based on three factors: their average pollen count, rate of allergy medicine use and ratio of allergists to patients. The list is topped with Wichita, Kan., considered to be this year's most challenging city to live in for people with allergies.

Allergy Tracker gives pollen forecast, mold count, information and forecasts using weather conditions historical data and research from weather.com Show me the weather in. City, zip, or place. Local pollen and mold counts help people manage their allergies by providing information about adverse conditions that might cause an allergic reaction, according to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. High pollen and mold counts in a particular ZIP code alert people in that area to limit their outdoor activity.

Here is the list, along with each city's score.

1. Wichita, Kan. (100.00)

2. Jackson, Miss. (96.44)

3. Knoxville, Tenn (94.32)

4. Louisville, Ky. (89.12)

5. Memphis, Tenn. (88.72 )

6. McAllen, Texas (88.37)

7. Baton Rouge, La. (87.87)

8. Dayton, Ohio (86.91)

9. Chattanooga, Tenn. (85.76)

10. Oklahoma City (85.65)

11. New Orleans (84.54)

12. Madison, Wisc. (83.67)

13. Omaha, Neb. (82.64)

14. Little Rock, Ark. (80.02)

15. Tulsa, Okla. (77.50)

16. Buffalo, N.Y. (77.10)

17. Grand Rapids, Mich. (76.88)

18. Dallas (76.63)

19. Detroit (76.27)

20. Toledo, Ohio (75.59)

21. Birmingham, Ala. (74.54)

22. Des Moines, Iowa (73.86)

Pollen

23. San Antonio (73.53)

24. Nashville, Tenn. (72.37)

25. Syracuse, N.Y. (72.35)

26. Charleston, S.C. (70.96)

27. Augusta, Ga. (70.71)

28. Providence, R.I. (70.15)

29. St. Louis (70.08)

30. Greenville, S.C. (69.63)

31. Youngstown, Ohio (69.47)

32. Houston (68.95)

33. Columbia, S.C. (68.12)

34. Virginia Beach, Va. (67.82)

35. Rochester, N.Y. (67.67)

36. Akron, Ohio (67.33)

37. Minneapolis (66.99)

38. Kansas City, Mo. (66.80)

39. Portland, Maine (66.32)

40. Columbus, Ohio (65.52)

Historical Pollen Count Data By Zip Code

41. Cleveland (65.06)

42. Philadelphia (64.98)

43. Milwaukee (64.86)

44. Charlotte, N.C. (64.73)

45. Austin, Texas (64.45)

46. Pittsburgh (64.37)

47. Riverside, Calif. (63.48)

48. Albany, N.Y. (62.40)

49. Greensboro, N.C. (61.99)

50. Indianapolis (61.80)

51. Scranton, Pa. (60.04)

52. El Paso, Texas (59.84)

53. Hartford, Conn. (59.21)

Historical pollen count data

54. Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (59.09)

55. Cincinnati (58.73)

56. New York (58.71)

57. Richmond, Va. (58.27)

58. Chicago (58.25)

59. Jacksonville, Fla. (58.18)

60. Allentown, Pa. (58.16)

61. Springfield, Mass. (58.00)

62. New Haven, Conn. (57.64)

63. Lakeland, Fla. (56.79)

64. Fresno, Calif. (56.40)

65. Cape Coral, Fla. (56.38)

66. Bridgeport, Conn. (56.32)

67. Miami (55.55)

68. Harrisburg, Pa. (55.48)

69. Worcester, Mass. (55.25)

70. Las Vegas (55.22)

71. Tampa, Fla. (54.22)

72. Phoenix (54.06)

73. Tucson, Ariz. (53.96)

74. Atlanta (53.67)

75. Boston (52.88)

76. Los Angeles (52.28)

77. Lancaster, Pa. (51.92)

78. Bakersfield, Calif. (51.89)

79. Orlando, Fla. (51.33)

80. Ogden, Utah (50.57)

81. Baltimore (48.62)

82. Albuquerque, N.M. (48.62)

Pine Pollen Counts By Zip Code

83. Washington, D.C. (48.06)

84. Seattle (47.05)

85. Raleigh, N.C. (47.00)

Pollen And Mold Counts By Zip Code

86. Sarasota, Fla. (46.55)

87. Modesto, Calif. (46.28)

88. San Francisco (45.74)

89. Palm Bay, Fla. (45.64)

90. Oxnard, Calif. (45.26)

91. San Diego (44.36)

92. Salt Lake City (43.16)

93. Boise, Idaho (43.11)

94. Denver (42.97)

95. San Jose, Calif. (42.78)

96. Daytona Beach, Fla. (41.60)

97. Colorado Springs, Colo. (40.86)

98. Stockton, Calif. (40.08)

99. Sacramento, Calif. (37.95)

100. Portland, Ore. (37.87)

Follow us @livescience, Facebook& Google+.

Comments are closed.